Sunday, July 13, 2025
HomeGhost GeekEstes method: scientific examination

Estes method: scientific examination


Estes method is the latest trend to sweep ghost hunting circles. It claims it is a more accurate spiritual communication. So, what is the deal?

According to Weird Web site, the idea was imagined by the Ghost Tour organizers who host the ghost events at the Stanley Hotel. Greg Newker writes that the trio is wondering what will happen. they receiver.

P-SB7 Box

Now, the Soul box (for anyone uncommon with ghost hunting technology) is a device that sweeps radio signals. This results in a mixed mixture of sound scraps from different frequencies with some white noise all the time. The hypothesis of ghost lovers is that ghosts (or entities) can process this sound to present messages. Estes method mainly depends on this idea. The method adds to the use of calibration headphones that make noise to the mixture. In addition to asking the person to use headphones to be blindfolded (so that they cannot read the lips). They become the “recipient” who listens to messages of ghosts through the Soul box to answer the questions posed by the “operator” – another member of the group.

And they are controlling

The introduction of the isolated headphones and their blindfold appears to be an attempt to introduce some scientific controls in the Square Square session. Trying to add control elements is to be formulated because this is the quality of useful data. One of the main criticisms of communication in the regular spirit box is that “messages” that are chosen from the sound are open to the interpretation because everyone is present know the question that is being asked. This previous knowledge makes them explain sound scraps to suit answers to questions.

By moving the sound from the Soul box through the headphones so that only one person can hear it, it is an attempt to overcome this barrier because the recipient does not hear the questions. However, these controls are not useful in this way as it may appear at first. In fact, I would like to wonder if these measures can be considered controls at all. This is because the next sound through headphones from the Soul box is still open to the interpretation by the recipient. They know about the alleged investigation or ambiguity that is being investigated, and this is likely to affect the way in which the sound excerpts are explained.

Not only that, but the “operator”, which also asks questions on prior knowledge of painful investigation as well, which will also affect the questions they ask and the way they explain the answers they receive. The operator is also supposed to not meet their questions based on the answers they get, but they will definitely do so. We see this happening in the Horning Hunting TV documentary programs where the Estes method has been circulated.

Estes method as shown in the Helier documentary. (source)

There will also be cases where a question is asked where a meaningless “answer” is given, or where the recipient will say something they heard through the device that was not in response to a question. Let’s call this strange data. Two things will happen to these external phrases – either they will be ignored and visits only (positive responses) will be shared as evidence. This is the approach of non -scientific reporting and prejudice known as Cherry penetration. Or, external data will be formulated in the painful narration in one way or another, or it will be taken again at a later time or date when it is decided to be logical.

Moreover, in his week in a strange article, newkirk recommends a specific model of the isolated headphones used by studio drummers. Newkirk writes that they “prevent external noise up to 25 decibels, and unintentionally exclude the occupational or frank fraud questions.” Looking at the fact that the voice of human conversation sits at about 60 decibels, I can only ask about the effectiveness of headphones such as control here. There will definitely a chance of unintended external influence.

As you can see, there are several ways of biases to create the results of the Estes method, and therefore ghost lovers do not want to the back experience it controls. The way it is presented makes it look scientific, but in the end it does not do enough to control external influences and biases.

Ganzfeld experiments

Comparisons were made between the Estes method and the experiences of Ganzfeld by many commentators and preachers. However, the only similarity between the two is that external stimuli is purposefully limited to the future. Participants in GanzFELD experiments were shower to pink noise through headphones, and they were bathing in red light, and they had half the Ping Pen on each eye. This was done to test whether cutting out the external stimuli will help the recipient focus on internal stimuli – that is, communication risk. The operator in a different room will focus on one of four pictures and tries to send this image to the remote reception device. The recipient is then asked to choose any of the four pictures that “saw”.

In his book, Additional sensory: science, risk sciences and other minds of mindand Brian Cling notes that only four pictures of selection are a relatively low number. There were many other design defects in Ganzfeld experiences as well. For example, the data analysis was sometimes made to make the data look better and sometimes some data will be included. There were also low numbers of experiments due to the time that each Ganzfeld experience took, compared to other experiments in risk.

Humans are students in patterns

Ultimately, the act of trying to communicate with certain entities, or any entities in a specific context will take the research from the beginning. There is also no clear evidence of how to use a paranormal entity for the soul brand to communicate in the first place. Observers are mainly informed of the nominal value that this is possible.

That is why, when it comes to collecting data, those who are scientifically studying paranormal experiences, psychology, and anomalies are trying to put the appropriate controls in place. We humans are very good in searching for patterns, as well as capturing hidden hints without meaning. Humans find contacts where there is nothing, and the random meaning. For many, coincidences must have a higher purpose because they feel very strange that they cannot be random, and ghosts appear in the pixels units of photographs. The main example of this at work is to see faces or animals in clouds, but for ghost hunters, ghost messages are often in mixed radio frequencies.

He is a British ghost hunter looking for the letters of the killer Ian Brady hearing a voice “Brady heard that” In this sound cross (noisy!) From her soul box …

… When that is actually the Radio X Sting for the X radio station, it is cut prematurely through the way the skeptic of the soul used …

Work against your human nature is almost impossible. As I wrote before, you can be fully aware of how the human brain and the mind do not deceive you in this way, and are still immune to influence. ((The rainbow was broken: on chance and the worship of death – Hayley is a ghost, August 5, 2018))

That is why it is impressive when ghost hunters try to insert the controls of their methods. However, for reasons that show above, the Estes method is limited to this front. Any data collected as a result of it can be assumed as a result of the scientifically controlled conditions or research.

Warning word …

He has condition,Greg New Kerak states that “The headphones should be connected to the” Spout “socket … patience is more sound and helps to exclude fraud … SB7 should be set on the scanning, at the highest possible level.. It should be noted that listening to loud noise through headphones for long periods of time can cause permanent Hearing damage.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments