When the ghost hunters try to search for ghosts in a scientific way, one of the first mistakes that they will involve, insisting that although their curriculum may seem unscientific for the external observer, this is simply not the case. Ghosts often make their investigations into the dark, and they use pieces of equipment that they do not use in ghost research (such as EMF meters, REM pods, dictatons and similar), you may use the use of intermediaries and media, and the use of spiritual communication technologies because they claim to try to experience the occurrence of eye witnesses. This is that when they test the activity for themselves, they can try to discriminate – scientifically – what is the reason.
The problem here, of course, is that unless the witnesses of the eyes test what they report while in the Al -Wasila company, with the appearance of lights, while using the EMF meter and holding some nutrition bars, all the hunter that Ghost does actually rid themselves of a strange experience. This will be mistakenly linked to the original experience as evidence of something that can be considered as possible evidence of the paranormal. It is not always possible to repeat the exact conditions in which the experiment occurs, but the fishermen often make ghosts a lot of effort to conduct their research in a way that does not resemble the original conditions as much as possible.
This may be an indication that the ghost fishermen concerned are not really concerned with knowing the original reason for the reported activity, and instead, they just want to try something strange and exciting. They provide a scientific explanation for their in -waysmanship because no one loves to be accused of being stupid and can be very permissible to play a world. When you reached a satisfactory conclusion, if you can persuade yourself and others that you did it scientifically, this is more satisfactory.
However, by extinguishing lights, “communication” with ghosts, using phone applications or spiritual communication methods, working with mediators or chasing EMF fluctuations for each case, ghost hunters are simply exposed to a series of events caused by expectation of expectation. In fact, there is a full set of biases that ghost fishermen will face during their investigations and the only way to avoid this is by learning what it is and how they can affect the work that is done in the case.
Emphasizing confirmationFor example, it can cause the investigator to be interpreted incorrectly because they are unaware of the information that is appropriate for their belief that the site is haunted. Excellence prejudice Ghost investigator can cause their expectations to be chased from ghosts to influence the result. Bias attention It can cause ghost investigators to think of a haunted location or ghosts to pay more attention and increase more on worldly events (in the context of being possible evidence), which they did not think twice if they did not think about ghosts at that time.
Field conclusions and reports written by Ghost Hunters can be often through self -calculations of what the investigator has made steps to exclude personal biases, and for ghost fishermen around the world, there is often a problem with the chosen data. For example, the ghost hunters who use a manual lamp to communicate with ghosts (usually asks for the ghost of the lamp and removed it on the questions), they notice on the occasions where the lamp is running in response to a question, but they will not notice those cases that the lamp that has not been operated in response to the question is not observed, or it may not be operated but not in response to the issue. Since all data is important when evaluating the research, only positive data is included that the reports that are written are not accurate, honest or useful.
A large part of supernatural research revolves around the minimum effect that we can, as researchers, have the results we have reached. We must make sure that our observations are as objective and not to work alone in the case can help us exclude the interpretations of what happened. Even a post -investigation counterpart can help you to determine these occasions about the time when you have taken biased decisions through a colleague referring to you. Acknowledging the limits of your ability to be an objective and rational investigator is not a bad thing – this means that you are already in the middle of the road.
