Various news sites reported an alleged ghost photo taken in Beceworth Asylum in Australia. The claim is that the image cannot be explained and that this shows a semi -transparent “personality” behind the people who were present.
I know this may be horrific, but the image can be explained using a carefully made tibi that explains the formula:
Profit from ghost events x bad photography skills + investing in ghosts being real = explanation
Discounts, this formula looks like this:
Profit x skill deficiency + self -= explanation
The image has been shared with the media by Geoff Brown and is the coach of the Beceworth Asylum Ghost Tours. When you involve customers, this makes me wonder about the safety of those who promote supernatural demands. To maintain the arrival of business, people who do these types of ghost events must constantly keep pace with the idea that the place is actively haunted and deserves to be visited. Also, from my opinion that this will reduce the threshold of what the people involved in these events want to accept or claim it is supernatural in nature.
Geoff Brown is clearly investing in the promotion of ghost stories from Becechworth Asylum, which means that he is unable to review any alleged ghost evidence produced either by his customers. There is nothing wrong with the existence of a personal perspective of a situation as long as you remember that you are not objective and do not make ground claims that require an objective view to be valid. For example, an image can not be explained or incredible, when it can be explained and do not believe.
This article is written by Hoksbury Gazette He says that some people have indicated that the anomalies in the picture are likely to be a long exposure to the camera used while people move. Jeff Brown was fast in shooting this. She said that “we know two professional photographers working with tampering with pictures and Photoshop, so I will send the original version to two of them and see what they say.”
Mr. Brown. Jeff. Can I call you Jeff? owner. My friend. Do you really need to send this image to photography experts before you are ready to admit that the whole image is blurry and poor quality? Can’t you see that someone’s finger is partially on the lens in the lower right corner?
Jeff, my love, don’t you see that people at the front of the image do not have faces? Where are their faces, Jeff? Why do they have no faces? Why this image has a quality similar to the profile you were using, when he was a teenager, on myspace? Sepia filtering, those pills … they restore everything.
I have a free resource available on this named blog Photography of ghost investigations Which defines some simple ways to ensure that you do not create unnecessary anomalies in your photos. The so -called unpracting ghost image from Beceworth Asylum is fine in most of these basic rules.
It is very deceptive to look at a picture taken in the dark, without Traibud, and with long exposure like anything other than a poor quality image. Sometimes, I think ghost fishermen need a reminder to remain modest.
