Peter laws Tweet recently “At least two channels on YouTube channels were recorded and published” Soul Square Sessions “that claim to call the devastating Oceangate submarine. The first video was published 21 hours ago, just a day after the advertisement of the tragedy. Ideas?”
Two channels on YouTube recorded at least a paranormal and published “Soul Square Sessions” that claim to call the devastating Oceangate submarine. The first video was published 21 hours ago, just a day after the tragedy was announced. ideas? pic.twitter.com/etjbuembd
Peter Laws (Revpeterlaws) June 24, 2023
In response, many people from all over a disgusting research communities expressed from these videos and calls, describing them as inappropriate, shameful, tasteless, and shameful. I agree that claims to contact the deceased in this incident are a weak taste, but certainly not an example. The screenshot shows that one of the accounts is HUFF PARANORMAL, which has a history of behaving this way.
Post -tragedy calls for spiritual communication are very common. Oscars, spiritual means, ghost hunters, and those who claim communication with ghosts through electronic equipment always appear most of the time. Usually because this allows them to fill the information space with any nonsense they want to claim it comes from the lives that are speaking to, or because the main news provides easy access to information. It is also a typical behavior looking for attention from those who suffer from excessive vanity.
However, as much as the people who make these allegations behave in a weak taste, I can only ask at any point that we can no longer claim to speak to those who died in tragic circumstances? next week? Next year? In a decade? never?
If someone posted a video on YouTube claiming to speak to the people who died in the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York, will this be remotely? What if someone posted a video claiming to speak to those who died during the Great London fire in 1666? To avoid suspicion, I think it will be important in both cases, but we know with certainty that ghost fishermen and paranormal fishermen claim to communicate with the long collapses all the time, including those who died in tragic circumstances … so there is a threshold of taste/taste.
However, what is this threshold and whoever decided that it is not clear. When it comes to a taste, what is considered an unauthorized time? I wonder whether it is easier to refer to ghost fishermen to those who make bad allegations of communicating with the soul and condemning them for that, instead of converting this critical eye into their behavior as well? The behavior that may be more like what they owe than they believe.
The question arises – Should those who wear homes haunted with glass are stones?
