Ghost girl caught directly on the camera?

The Saya Ghost hunting team called Pengegers Paranormal Pansy – which was initially formed as a joke – says they had seized evidence of the paranormal on the camera in the old church in Redrute. According to CornovThe fishermen visited the ghosts of the church at night to conduct live ghosts and claim that the people who watched their live uphums noticed something strange in the church window as shown below …

The team described it as “A strange figure in the church window on the upper floor“What they say”It cannot be a living person like “(R) Here is not inside the church. Everything has been stripped. While we were walking, on the live broadcast, you can see the outline of a girl in the window.“

Can you really see the outlines of a girl raised in the deserted church window? I am sure you agree that this is a good question.

The investigation of appearing

I moved to Google Maps in the street width mode, useful, added the people who visited the church during the day pictures of the church from different different angles, including from within the church itself. Although it is correct that the church places empty with historical plaques and a memorial only on the interior walls, this means that the little girl floats in the upper window in doubtful matter, at the very least.

“It cannot be a living person.” It does not mean that the logical interpretation of jumping to him is that it is the personality of the deceased person. Church exploration through the streets of street street shows that windows have detailed tires with some tires that still contain glass or acrylic.

The walls are very high and the windows are placed in a way when they look from the ground level to the upper part of the church, you can see the windows from the next wall through the windows in the wall you face. With this in mind, when width of the alleged ghost shot, it seems clear that “shape” is just a higher space than a window placed in the wall to the left. Part of the window frame that creates the appearance veils from the width by the window frame in the front.

The problem of living ghosts

Living ghost hunting is the advanced version of the ghost webcam sites in the old school. These sites were the way I bowed for the first time from ghost hunting when I was 14/15, and in the end, how I participated in the extraordinary search. On these sites, you will see the live web cameras created in the alleged inhabited places to see if you can discover anything strange on them. There were cameras in a house in Missouri I was watching with passion, and web cameras at the Williad Library, for example.

Low -quality web cameras are often updated routinely (they can range from every 15 seconds to every 15 minutes), and then a screenshot of anything strange you saw and publish in accompanying forums so that you and others can discuss “CAP” (colloquial for admission).

Unfortunately, ghost hunters are the worst type of ghost search there. The “evidence” often presented by those who sit at home and watch live shots on social media. The cameras they see are often connected, or the ghost hunters keep them at the site and flow live via WiFi sometimes dodging. The sites tend to be dark with many confusing variables that a person at home is not aware that he does not exist.

In addition, we did not present a picture taken by a camera, but still from some weak -quality shots, and this is largely all the live ghost hunters that will be made at all to support their superpowers. Not only that, but it is not among the ghost hunters themselves the ones who discovered the alleged anomalies, it is impossible to collect a reliable certificate about what happened from them. They usually return the stories of others.

Since the person in the house is not on the site, his experience is also limited and therefore not reliable as well. Ghost fishermen often respond to the live chat that accompanies the direct broadcasting footage, and if someone is watching over his length he says they have seen something, the fishermen will respond to ghosts for this and adapt to what they do. First, having to focus on such a chat takes the attention of investigators away from their surroundings, which means that their testimony is more reliable. Second, your concentration of your investigation on the experiences of a person who is not present on the site is ridiculous.

On their Facebook collection, more than 500 people watch with their live videos are posting dozens of screenshots from videos with red circles that are drawn largely, nothing he sees personally important. In the group, “Pansi” says “You will not be skeptical after our follow -up.”

I beg to differ…