Llifs – hallucinations Llifs.com.au

Thus, in a ridiculous way, we sometimes hear men mock the phenomena that already occur, simply because these phenomena are not commensurate with their prejudices of what the ghost phenomena should be;

Friedrich Ma Maraz

“The human personality and its survival of physical death”

Before we start, do not let the term hallucinations control you. I do not point out at all that the ghost scenes are simply hallucinations of a person’s imagination (although I am sure this can explain some events). The theory is that the person who sees a ghost does not necessarily witness a kind of physical appearance, but rather see the ghost in his minds caused by a form of risk. It is also important to note that this is not a comprehensive explanation or theory that explains all scenes and experiences with ghosts. It is one of many theories that deserve to be considered some Cases of supernatural phenomena.

Helling risk

The term hallucinations was discussed remotely in the book “Phantas of the Leving” (1886) written by Edmund Gurny, Friedrich, and Meers & Frank Bodomor.

To review the hallucinations, the risk, so far, has shown that it may take very different forms, and may be presented at different time periods (within a few hours) of the crisis or event that we follow; Therefore, assuming that many people were receiving from an external impression, it appears that it is unlikely to invest them independently at the same moment with the same sensory form. Not, again, we must expect to find, among the affected people, any person who shakes a stranger to the distant factor; However, the cases in which such a person participated in collective repetition. Once again, this theory of independent affection for many people does not seem to be a special reason for their presence in each other at that time, because the agent may have an effect on equal footing in any direction; However, the cases where Percipients were separated, in fact, very rare.

I wrote several times ago about the idea that ghosts could be simply. By thinking about someone, do we expect to be? Hallucinations indicate the risk that the ghost that someone sees is actually at the recipient of the risk. I assume here that you can theory in several different ways. Does another person in the room cause this or is the souls stimulating a distance experience? For example, when the soul itself appears, instead of physical manifestations, are they displaying their image remotely on a reassuring reception device?

It can even present a theory about the reason for seeing lives in the period of the period.

Ghosts wearing clothes

One of the many questions that the lovers of the paranormal think about the idea of ​​souls that wear clothes and even how they appear. Often when a person sees the ghost of a family member who has gone through aging or illness, they see them looking for health and almost younger. The media she spoke to her has made it clear that she believes that souls want us to show us the best forms and how they see themselves. When you look at it in this way, it is strongly inclined to the concept of hallucinations.

In his book, Halousa, the risk, Frank Bodomor wrote:

Ghosts, it will be observed, always looks clothes. Do you also have an ethereal clothes? This was the belief in many early races of humanity, who leave clothes, food and weapons in the graves of the dead, or burn them on the funeral pile, so that their friends may be everything they need in the world of the soul. But are we ready to accept this opinion? Once again, these ghosts usually appear, not in the clothes they were wearing at death for most deaths in bed but in each other, as it will appear from examining the stories already mentioned. Do we assume that the ethereal body goes to its wardrobe for its bare clothes? Or that, as in the appearance of the Cavalcante flag to Frau Rieken, the ghost will already take off the ethereal clothes that you wore at death and replace them with others? It is barely necessary to follow the topic. The difficulties and contradictions involved in their adaptation to explain the clothes should be fatal for ghosts.

Whatever other, it seems clear that these appearances are not ghosts in the old sense. However, unless we would like to trust the testimony of man, it is something. Only during the past three or four generations, science has been in a position to explain what these appearances are in reality. It has now been agreed that it is one of the things that dreams make; In fact, they wake up from dreams, or in technical phrases, sensory hallucinations.

This thinking line helps explain the reason for a room of people, and only one person will see a ghost personality. It can also explain the reason for the person who photographed or takes a picture to take it because it is not material but in his minds. This means that the rules of “optics” are not playing.

If you see a hallucinogenic character “outside the room”, his side is not postponed by visual laws (it may seem behind the observer, or in another way in his visual field), but he will correspond to one way or another-by just a self-esteem, if nothing else-to visual laws; Moreover, it still seems to be from a fixed point in space, which is from the eyes of the fixed observer or his brain.

The human personality and its survival of physical death (1920) by Friedrich Wi -Meers Volume 2

There is a lot for discussion and thinking about it in this field, which is great to digest and think about it, so now, I will write more about this in the coming weeks.

At the same time, a list of proposed reading that covers this topic strongly.

Suggested reading:

Phantasms of the Living 1886) by Edmund Jurny, Frederick Win Meers and Frank Bodomor

The human personality and its survival of physical death (1903) by Frederick Wi -Meers Volume 1

The human personality and its survival of physical death (1920) by Friedrich Wi -Meers Volume 2

Halunikat Risk: The new ghost view (1909) written by Frank Bodomor

You can read it for free online thanks to the public domain and also download a PDF file. These texts are very important and not only discuss different theories with regard to life after death or what we will describe as ghosts, but also provide status and examples. What I like most about this is that it challenges the typical explanations of what is the ghost. These books were written and published in the early twentieth century, which shows us that we have not necessarily evolved in our thinking of what ghosts or lives may be. In fact, I think in some respects that we have gone a little back and focused less on theories and how and why many people face ghost confrontations instead of what is trying to capture evidence.

Image coverage by karolina grabowska: https://www.pexels.com/photo/person-wearing-a-ghost-costume-5422606/