Llifs – I (no) I want to believe

I was watching a show this year on Discovery: Gien Encouns: Fact or Fiction. “Ufo Mitch Horowitz and Chrissy Newton uses data and scientific research to dissect real life confrontations with activity outside the planet.“

People expose them to their experiences to verify them mainly or were exposed, of course, it was on the right of my alley. In the first episode, after the death of his father, one of the farms believes that he witnessed a mysterious body, something he believed to be linked to his father. His father died and soon had a dream as his father visited him to tell him that death was not the end. He himself admitted that he was deep in sadness. It was not long after this experience, and stood in the garden and photographing what he believed is an cheating body with an experience associated with his dream from his father. Being a video, it was organized and also the history and time information that would later turn into work against it. Once its video was presented, the researchers were able to access the data that indicated what was photographed is actually the international space station that was in the vicinity of video capture. They also went further to compare the video with one ISS, which indicates its speed and how it appears suddenly when it is in the range. It was difficult to ignore the data because it perfectly matched. Since this was presented to the farmer, it became more surprising, claiming that the data was wrong and that what was depicted was ISS. With more data, he doubled and said that everything was BS and he knew he had acquired the real thing. He said that this will not prevent him and that he knows what he tests so that he does not care about what people think about in his video (although he presented him to a TV program in the hope of verifying it).

I have seen many similar interactions on social media. Someone displays a picture in a group and asks if his image has taken something like a ghost or a strange body. Upon entering, they feel uncomfortable and defensive and they are bound that they know what they lived, so the data or information is wrong because they only know. They (no) want to believe what is presented. Now I need to point out that sometimes in these groups, you have people who just want to prove that there is something wrong because they do not believe what has been presented. It can be aggressive and throw information there, saying it is not real because they want to prove their point of view. This is also not useful.

In the case of this farmer, it was a great link to him and his father, who was still saddened by loss. Perhaps if he accepts that he captured ISS and not a mysterious body, he relieves the feeling that his father is going around. Although some people are looking for an explanation because they are curious and therefore more acceptable, others want to verify health for personal attachment and will accept anything other than the answer they want to hear. Where does this leave us?

You sometimes have two groups of people who do not want to believe anything other than what they want to hear. Or not or not, you will never convince some people. Is it worth the battle?

In my eyes, I think the paranormal is very personal. What someone sees as evidence, another person sees something else. I do not think it is a subject that will be proven widely and scientifically acceptable. So what should we really ask is why do we ask others? Is it because we really want an answer, or do we want to verify the validity of something special for us? I recently spoken to many people who have been with them over the years. Many of them talked about an experience that was deep for them, and I was there next to them. The thing, in most cases, I don’t remember it at all, but for them it changed life. They remember this in great detail on how they feel. There will be experiences that I will always remember and close to me, but the person next to me will not remember them. Why? Because he is personal.

Perhaps it does not matter what we believe in because in the end it seems about what makes us feel. Whether it is afraid, alone, connected, happy, optimistic, or anything else, it gives us something individual and personal. We need to stop asking to verify health from strangers and start looking inside and asking ourselves, only what do we need this validity?

I have suffered from things that I cannot explain and I am also a skeptical person. I am often asked to review the evidence and most of the time I refuse to do so. Not because I cannot explain, but because in most cases, I can. Just because I can explain that, does it mean that something is not a paranormal? Just because I can explain something, does it change how to make a person feel? What we know in certainty actually happened is that this person suffered from something that had a profound impact on him. Whether it is a natural thing or something that is a paranormal, it does not matter, it does not matter what the feeling itself is. In our search for unknown, ghosts and spirits, we should not lose our humanity.