On January 5, I was examined The media reported that Rendelsham Forest UFO was a joke all the time. I discovered that the research by Dr. David Clark has been managed by most of the media. I also wrote about the extent of the UFICILIC NECK POPE, a strange attack on Clark based on this wrong report.
Pope accused Dr. Clark of being a “needy and honest.” At the time of writing this report, (on the afternoon of January 25, 2019), posts are still on his Facebook file and Twitter schedule – about a month later. I recently contacted the Pope to see if he could detail me how exactly that Clark committed the plagiarism, but he could not do so. It is a very dangerous accusation, after all! Bob claimed that this claim is based on a deceased investigator’s belief that her work has been copied by Clark. When I asked if I could show the work that was impersonator, I was told that it no longer exists.
Based on the fact that the word mouth does not constitute evidence, I think it is fair to say that there is no impersonation and any accusations of this wrong and destructive. Perhaps intentionally. I hope that Nick Pob is thinking about removing such comments from his platforms on social media because it does not appear exactly to him in the best light, it is misleading … and perhaps defamation.
In our e -mail exchange, Bob then went to details about David Clark’s guilt because of “demanding credit for the work of others.” This relates to the launch of the Ministry of Defense documents on UFO scenes. Almost at the same time, I was talking to Dr. Clark on the topic of the previous blog post and the reaction of the Pope. Shortly after that I received an email from Clark entitled “The non -existing FOI campaign” containing … well … literally the opposite. Email details are impressive wealth from documented work (End 3000 pages From Clark campaigns!) It extends from 1999 to the modern era.
You can find complete details about David’s work The official website of the national archive here It is also possible to access the released Mod UFO files. You can also read one part of a Clark summary on his website here. Therefore, although Nick Pob may be right when he states that others were also appealing to the issuance of documents, it is definitely clear in my mind that David Clark was a major player here.
Not only that, but as the Ministry of Defense refers to themselves, the issuance of their files in reality precedes the revitalization of the laws of freedom of information for the year 2000. This aforementioned can be seen in the Ministry of Defense document issued from April 2006 in the surrounding of Representative Norman Baker about the work of Nick Bob (Defe 24/2032). In this, the Ministry of Defense NickBob says that “his knowledge of this issue, unlike the sources available to the public, must be considered a dated.”
The document continues, “Mr. Bob was elected to describe his position as” the head of the Mod UFO project “, which is a completely term of his invention OW … Mr. Bob is constantly putting himself forward in different parts of the media, and credit and inspection are obtained” although “the expert.” The latter is far from the truth, as we started publishing the details of the “most popular” reports in the publishing scheme, before the emergence of the Freedom of Information Law.
So … who is really in need, not ufocion, huh?
