With the deterioration of 2019, I saw some entertainment as my Facebook extract is filled with jobs about the last accident in Saga, which is the Rendelsham Forest UFO case. For those who are not familiar with the case, it included a series of strange reports almost forty years ago of the American Air Force employees stationed in RAF Woodridge in Sofolk.
Rendelsham is considered that the most famous UKS legend in UFO and the interesting issue can be read on Ian Ridpath site by clicking here. He concludes that the two -day incident was mainly “a misinterpretation of a series of night lights.” There are many who disagree with this and believe that Rendelsham was a real foreign visit, and many claim that anyone demanding otherwise may participate in covering up some kind.
The Rendelsham Forest UFO case is often in the news with new information, and there is a UFO conference, a documentary, etc. There is Business movie More than that, but with 2018 it became in 2019, the Rendelsham case was shook with the news that Everything can be a joke. This appeared after one of Sas-Endeder called UFO researcher UFO with the truth …
… but not everything as it might seem with this clear interpretation.
On his website, Dr. David Clark reveals In detail, how is this from the inside- which he called it sincere -I initially contacted him with confession, and Clark sat on the details after investigating his validity. Clark wanted to know if it was sincere He will go to another place with his story, and do. Clark reveals the details sincere Report indicates that he does not say the truth. It is a very enjoyable reading and some great investigative works.
What is interesting, though, is what happened after the popular media first managed the story. It was reported in a way that has been reported to be reported. Sun newspaperFor example, transferring Clark in a way that made it look as if he was promoting to demand that the joke was a correct explanation, when a quick reading of the full article on his website was revealed on the web about the lack of an event.
Enter NickBob. The newspapers also ran with a joke demand, the publication of Nick Bob Rejectionist On his Facebook page. He wrote “A) Another theory of the UFO Forest Forest incident. This time, it is required from the UFICILT world who says that a person claimed to have called him in SAS, who claimed that the whole thing was a joke – that is, a classic friend of a friend’s story, with zero evidence.
The Pope is right. There was zero evidence of a joke. However, he continues that “the world of Ufoing concerned is a university lecturer who was previously accused of plagiarism, so the entire story appears very suspicious, and it may simply be a state of a needy specialist, who is not trusted trying to write himself in the story.”
Dr. David Clark was a former lecturer, a journalist, a lecturer in the press at the University of Sheffield Halum with a doctorate in folklore. There is no reliable accusation against impersonating him, so this claim from the Pope seemed strange, at the very least. But what surprised me most was that the Pope did not bother to investigate the stories of Tablide more than that. As a person who has worked widely with the media during his career as a pathology expert, I believed that Bob would know how worthwhile of the tablids. Personally, I have much less inputs, effect and communication, however, I suffered directly from reporting directly in unethical ways.
If he had spent a moment to look beyond the demands of exciting titles, it is possible that Bob had discovered the article that Dr. Clark wrote on his website, which clearly explains the reason why the claim was not accepted that the Randelsham forest incident was a joke. The Pope’s conclusion also He carries. The difference is only that Clark did the leg to investigate this claim, while the Pope rejected it prior From his perceived position of power.
Not only that, but the Pope’s lack of research led to a lack of reason To a person The attack on Dr. David Clark, who accepted the large number of Pope, mainly followed by the nominal value. This does not sit with me at all. It is a very dangerous accusation against someone in the Clark line. In the past, on several occasions, people tried to destroy my career by contacting employers with lies about me because I exposed something they think is true. He also reminded me of the dangerous nature of Accusing mining quotation James Randy towards the author and journalist, Will Store, when Store wrote about Iman Randy in Darwinism.
Performing mining accusations of quotation or Apple against people working in the press is really very dangerous, and if he is unjustified, he really questions the safety of the person who is accused in the first place. this To a person The attack on Clark from the Pope was surprising to me because although I realize that there is a rift in epidemics between different thought camps, I expected at least the Pope to be above this type of broadcast. A good investigator never allows the ego to the cloud of their rule.
