Former US Air Force Commander Robert Salas, a major witness to one of the most important UFO incidents in military history answer To the latest Wall Street Journal on Pentagon’s misinformation.
In his refutation, Salas dismantles the government’s recent attempt to explain the 1967 Malmstrom missile incident, accused of officials of spreading lies to hide the truth.
On June 6, the Wall Street Journal was martyred at the anomalies ’decision in all fields (Aaro) in the Pentagon (Aaro) claiming that the incident of 1967, when ten nuclear missiles failed in mysterious circumstances during the UFO meeting, was already caused by the secret electromagnetic pulse test. Salas, who was in service that night, calls this interpretation “imagination” and provides multiple reasons for not correcting it.
During a two -hour presentation of Aaro investigators in February 2023, Salas says they did not mention any “ground interpretation” of the accident.
When he asked whether they would be investigating his account with the Air Force, they admitted that USAF did not cooperate with the investigation. This lack of basic verification raises serious questions about Arrow’s claims.
The magazine’s description of the 60 -foot EMP generator near the missile site contradicts directly with the experience of the employees stationed there. Salas notes that such a device was impossible to hide it from security teams, but no one mentioned his vision. More importantly, missile sets have not been informed of the EMP test – an unimaginable supervision during the Cold War when nuclear preparation was very important.
Documents that have been raised by the confidentiality undermined the Pentagon story. Secret 1967 Telex from the strategic air command called the missile failure “the cause of intense interest” and demanded the investigation.
Boeing’s investigation team, led by Robert Kaminski, later concluded that there was no “technical interpretation” of the closure. It is worth noting that their report did not mention the EMP test as a possible reason.
Multiple eyewitnesses reported seeing a glowing body hovering over missile silos that night. According to what the security personnel were terrified of horror from what they saw – a meaningless reaction if this is just an approved test. The base records confirm the time that many mysterious body scenes have been reported about Malmstrom in that evening.
From a scientific point of view, the EMP interpretation fails the basic audit. Historical nuclear tests such as Starfish Prime in 1962 showed that electromagnetic impulses caused permanent damage to electronics, however Malmstrom missiles returned to normal operation shortly after the accident. The Ministry of Energy confirmed that there are no nuclear tests on the dates concerned.
Dahi Salas provides a clear case: the last interpretation of the Pentagon does not stand up to the examination. His account, with the support of multiple documents and witnesses, indicates that officials are still trying to block what actually happened on that night in 1967.
The former missile officer now calls for Congress hearings with right -wing testimonies of all witnesses and the full withdrawal of the accidents related to the accident.
His challenge in the Wall Street Journal to publish his full refute puts additional pressure on the media to audit the changing accounts of the government.
This controversy comes at a critical time as Aaro is preparing to release more results on historical UFO cases. Salas detailed, Disnas, raises serious questions about whether the next report will provide real transparency or simply restore the old misinformation.
As one of the most reliable military witnesses of the UFO activity near nuclear installations, Salas’s testimony cannot be easily rejected. Its refutation faces decades of formal deception in terms of unspecified air phenomena and national security.
