I know very well what is to play the DEBUNKER TUG-O’A’A’A’AR game. At one end of the rope, the researchers are skeptical at the other end of the paranormal supporters. Each team pulls and pulls and sometimes the other side is forced to take a step towards the line. Every step is a victory by the other team. However, in the end, no one gets anywhere.
My boy, did you feel foolish when I gave up the rope and noticed that there are complete groups of other people who do not participate …
Most people know me as a ghost researcher who does not believe in ghosts, who use a good investigation into the old to clarify the anomalies that may not be clear at first. I enjoy solving a good puzzle and I enjoy this approach to searching for the claims and reports of paranormal. I would like to think I am good at that too.
As a researcher, I respect the burden of proof – that is, anyone who claims must be able to support him with reasonable evidence. However, more and more, I ask myself what exactly will be as evidence of these allegations? We routinely reject (truly) photos and videos of the alleged super activity as a guide because they are not reliable, and the testimony of eye witnesses is only accurate like the brain that he remembers-and this means: not very. This means that there is not really a special way for people who claim to have a supernatural experience that proves to anyone who doubts the truth of the experience.
One can argue that this is a closed condition. This person says that they saw a dust paper raised in a building that was said to be haunted*, but there is no evidence other than their word and we cannot be sure that they recalled accurately what happened, or in reality they were witnessing everything that happens at that moment. It is a subjective experience.
This means that we have a number of options; We can reject the case prior Because he is personal. Or, we can claim that although there is no objective evidence, other people have seen strange things similar to nature, which means that this occurrence may be more than just one time, and it can be a paranormal.
Or, we can follow a third and fourth approach, which is what I prefer. The third approach is to properly investigate the case. This may include visiting the site to try to determine the common causes of what happened – and get those who have witnessed the occurrence, or who live/work there for help can be a useful process for them as well. The survey approach should not always involve a site visit as you may be able to determine the cause of the information provided to you instead.
The fourth approach is a human approach, or as I like to call it – a total approach. In 2018, I wrote a post entitled I am a comprehensive ghost investigator Explain this more. We can stop to admit that the reported experience occurred in the context of the human experience. Two different people can witness the same thing, but they can report completely different experiences. The raised dust paper, or is it pulled out of invisible hands? Each of us suffers from life differently and thus explains the world around us in different ways accordingly. We also remember memories differently, especially since more time passes between occurrence and remembering.
When your hands are tightly sticking to the rope during the DEBUNKER TUG-War game, you don’t have time to look at it. All you can do is focus on pulling the rope and winning the game. This is not human, nor is it a decent investigation work and I see everything common from skeptical investigators.
It is also important to remember that some people do not want to prove anything to the ghost researcher, they just want someone to admit that something strange has happened in his existence. Providing an ear listening and your sincere opinion is a wonderful form of dialogue because you are still honest in your lack of faith and you can provide alternative explanations about what you have seen, but in a more attractive way that you likely help to some extent. It gives you an insight into the rich fabric of the human experience.
There was a time when I could find my effort to expose the latest allegations made by the last jerk trying to get 15 minutes of fame by designing themselves as ghosts, psychological, or evil spirits, or anything on an equal footing with naive. By falling into this ballet, I sometimes failed to realize the difference between tremors and ordinary people I was in contact with. I came to realize that this approach to supernatural research does not mean in reality Do Very much and those who participate in this pantomim from Debunkerry are at risk of preaching to transformers and not much more.
As a paranormal researchers, we have to be keen not to overlook the human element of the stories that we communicate with when we search for allegations or when we deal with wrong information. You can be a good researcher, well -skeptical without jumping on every vehicle that presents itself. On the other hand, as he exposed fire from the hip and rushes to be the first to expose a story, or try to publish more articles that expose the latest superpowers more than the following DEBUNKER is irrational like a person who claims to marry a ghost piracy, or they have a pile at their garden. In addition, with this “moving, shoots”, you are at risk of seeing the ghosts when there is nothing, which is ridiculous when you think about it …
*An example is taken from an actual state of me, with the permission of the witnesses of the eye concerned before publishing.
