When you are a paranormal researcher, you can spend all your free time to investigate the history of famous inhabited places and expose allegations that have a historical contribution. It is true that the stories behind many hot points of a well -known ghost tourism are the product of some of the very creative minds that provide the truth (*Cough*30 East Drive*Coup*). However, in the end, exposing these stories can be a meaningless task because the people who are pushing to attend ghost hunting nights do not really care if the ghost story is real.
However, the last Twitter exchange made me want to risk preaching the choir and writing about the story of Sarah Winshster. The way its legacy is exposed forever through ghost tourism and the media absolves me. Result the movie 2018 WinsterHelen Mirin starring in her mysterious heavy Winschest. If you are interested in the paranormal, you may already know how Sarah built Winschest the home of mystery in Winchster in a way that mixes between the rocking souls of those who were killed by its rifles that originated from its wealth. There was based on the building around the clock, with the addition of new rooms all the time. Sarah was “obsessed” with the number 13, and firearms crazy resulted in strange degrees, and doors leading to any place and more.
Only, nothing is true. Once again in January 2018, The New York Times ran a piece Which explored this magic with Winschest in more details. Winchster biography, Mary Joe Enovo attributes the ghost stories as “cooking her journalists on her day.” It is harmful to the San Francisco earthquake in 1906, which led to the doors and stairs that lead anywhere and other anomalies. As for the guilty conscience around all the ghosts of death, IGNOFFO says this was difficult to believe. “There is no evidence for this … No one was guilty of weapons at the end of the twentieth century. Everyone used it and needed them.”
When I looked at the Winschester story several years ago, the thing that really surprised me was the fact that Sarah Winchester looked as a woman in mourning instead of a “crazy” woman. She had lost a child and her husband, who was known to wear dark clothes, so she was less haunted by ghosts and more inhabited than the bereavement she suffered.
These fragments from the truth will not prevent people from enjoying the nervous film that is said to be “dependent on a true story”, and the curious ghost will not prevent tours in the notorious home, or from believing the stories of ghosts associated with it. Perhaps even the ghost activity experience while it is! However, this says more about them than it can say about Sarah Winschest, a good example of why you are not always believed to you about the inhabited homes. People should take carefully when giving ghosts in such places because the stories of ghosts that you hunt are often re -formulated stories to people who have suffered from the tragedy and are at risk of being a person who is happy with this exploitation. The story of Sarah Winschester reminds me of the poor spirits that were imprisoned in the Chiton Malit prison here in the United Kingdom and it seems now, as it appears to be horrific appearances. My visit there with Danny Robbins from the haunted podcast Leave me I feel less than fun in everything.
Use your non -scientific ghost hunting devices, and your Ouija paintings, but you know that you are risking to stay away from these places with the support of ghosts that depend on a “true story” that is not correct at all.
