How to help WSJ to cover up the truth

A recent article in Wall Street Journal, “Disturbing information, the Pentagon, which fed UFO legends(June 6, 2025), claims to reveal how the US military used UFO stories to hide secret weapons programs. But a deeper analysis reveals something more worrying – the article itself may be part of a new campaign to mislead the Pentagon, manipulating the public perception under the curtain of transparency.

The WSJ report confirms that since the fifties of the last century, the Pentagon has published false images and strange stories – such as changing “Flying Site” pictures in the 51st region – to mislead the audience and hide advanced arms projects, such as hidden aircraft. Instead of hiding foreign technology, the army was protecting the secrets of national security in the Cold War era.

An investigation into the Pentagon imposed by Congress, led by senior scientists Sean Kirkpatrick, found that wrong information has spread by military officials and possibly institutional programs, and feeds decades of UFO legends. Some of these myths were deliberately allowed to prosper for the wrong foreign intelligence, especially the Soviet Union.

In 2023, investigators revealed strange rituals in the programs classified in the Air Force, where new leaders’ pictures were displayed to confront a fake vehicle and asked to keep it secret – the publication of false accounts. The Pentagon plans to issue a follow -up report soon, but the UAP report (an unlimited anomalous phenomenon) for 2024 (an unlimited anomaly) has already deleted critical details, which raised doubts.

He rejected strange bodies such as the Cold War

While the WSJ article recognizes the past deception, it also pays a new narration: that all major UFO accidents – including nuclear missile disorders – were either wrong in scenes, military joke or misunderstanding. This double tactic (past recognition is lying while rejecting modern evidence) does not clarify the truth – it increases this.

One of the most flagrant distortions includes the Malmstrom Air Force Base incident of 1967, with ten nuclear missiles suddenly closed during the reported UFO meeting. Captain Robert Salas, a service officer that night, has repeatedly stated that a glowing being hovering over the facility before the missiles disrupted.

However, WSJ is now repeating the new Pentagon’s claim: that the accident was just the electromagnetic pulse test (EMP). This interpretation collapses under the audit:

Emps cause permanent damage – they do not temporarily disrupt systems. The airline -raised airline study confirms that Emps Fry Electronics irreversibly, but Malmstrom missiles returned to normal operation shortly after.

The United States has already known EMP effects from the Starfish Prime test in 1962, where the high -height NUKE mobilized in the streets of Hawaii (900 miles) and satellites. If Malmstrom was injured by EMP, the damage was for a catastrophic and permanent.

Why does the Pentagon test EMP on live nuclear missiles during the Cold War? If they wanted EMP data, they had remote test sites – not active missile silos.

The Soviet UFO-Nuke accident: It was ignored because it does not fit

More cursed is the Pentagon’s silence on similar accidents outside. In 1982, near BYELOOKOROVICHE, Soviet Ukraine, a mysterious body It is said The missile launch sequence, and the putting of nuclear weapons in the countdown for 15 seconds, sparked terrifyingly before re -setting them in mysterious circumstances. ABC News mentioned that in 1994, however WSJ and Pentagon ignore it completely – because it contradicts their novel.

The Scientific Coalition for UAP (SCU) analyzed 590 cases of documented UFO cases (1945-1975) and found a statistically significant UFO activity near nuclear installations-weapons laboratories, missiles, and publishing rules. This was not random; A targeted monitoring by an unknown intelligence showed.

However, WSJ completely overlooks this guide, which enhances the idea that the article is not an investigative press but to control the narration.

Does the Pentagon use WSJ like Project Mockingbird?

WSJ timing is suspicious. The sources indicate that the anomalies ’decision in all areas of the Pentagon (Aaro) has already submitted the second part of the UFO report classified into Congress. The WSJ article may be preparing for the audience to get an antiseptic version, and adapt the acceptance of the Pentagon’s favorite story.

These mirrors Simulating bird projectCentral Intelligence Agency program, which infiltrated the main media during the Cold War to plant government propaganda. The WSJ piece, with its selective facts and a rejecting tone, fits completely.

Distinguish of violations – Witnesses like Salas are framing as misleading or deceiving, using irony to silence them.

Control of narration – Reduced from UFO’s history to “Cold War Plash” to avoid scrutiny of current secret programs.

Constituting the confusion – confess some lies but do not provide real answers, while preserving the audience in the dark.

The Pentagon does not come clean – it improves his deception. WSJ article is not a penetration; It is a psychological process. If we want the truth, Congress must launch an official investigation into the Pentagon’s continuous misinformation campaign.

The American people deserve the full story-not to cover up the other organizer.