In 2012, she recently conducted ghost research at the CFI conference in the UK in the Conway Hall. Unknown to me, he became a man in the back of the hall clearly angry during his speech and during the questions and answers session she stood up and accused me of ghost researchers. Why? Because a small part of my speech did not touch the phenomena of the heavenly crime, as many ghosts top the first stage of the soul. Ghosts are often said, and then appear in other forms before they become an appearance. However, critics were not anything of that and to reformulate it, “ghost fishermen do not think that. Only those who are on the margins of heavenly bodies as evidence.”
However, this is not true because many ghost hunting sites will provide celestial bodies as a guide to ghosts, or will try to distinguish between abnormal heavenly bodies and heavenly bodies of super origin. Last year or so, I noticed a little rise in the number of people who send me pictures or videos of criminals who were either or, in the case of other researchers, people sent them to them for an answer they redirected to me. This is a stories, of course. The other researchers who spoke to them did not notice an increase in the evidence of the heavenly offense that were sent to them, but they have been informed that they are still getting such pictures sent. So what we can take away from that is that people still offer celestial bodies as evidence of ghosts.
Recently, a story has been reported on Gloucestershire Live under the title: Watch carefully: Can you see ghosts that chase one of the oldest GloucestersHire? The answer to the question in the title is “No”, but I wanted to write about it anyway because it provides an interesting example of how ghost hunters continue to the idea that the heavenly bodies are evidence of ghosts in one way or another.
In the video above, you can hear members of the Gloucestershire superpower that claims that the celestial bodies they see can be distinguished from dust. One member says: “There is no way that is dust or anything like that because you see it all the time.” The problem in this logic is that it indicates that the air and other mobile particles are not present all the time but for sure.
If you take a flame (or a manual lamp if you are in the United States, and direct it up in a dark room, you will see the amount of dust in the air. You will see that it is moving and becomes more clear when it is in the light source. It is not missile science. What He is Complex science is to create dust -free environments (or Cleaning roomsAs is known,) that specialized industries spend millions in an attempt to accomplish them for research and manufacturing purposes, and they are still struggling. So, I guarantee that the house, office, shopping, or theater – or in this case, is not free from the ancient center. Not even for short periods of time.
Another problem in the video is claimed to show the heavenly heavenly bodies. All we can see is clips filmed on a secondary device and we do not have access to the footage of the cameras that the investigators watch. This may be because the CCTV system is not their offspring and belongs to the building (it appears that it is likely,), but when the ghost hunters offer a secondary piece like this, it cannot really be considered evidence that the quality of what is seen on CCTV screens is reduced by the fact that it is photographed by a second camera. A camera that should be on a traibod, by the way – You can read my guide to taking pictures during ghost investigations hereAnd many apply to photography as well.
At some point, the Camerovson enlarges the CCTV screen as if it would help us. As you can see, the shots they photographed consist of thousands of pixels that were formed to show us the object that is photographed, but in this case, the object that is filmed is a screen that shows the thousands of pixels that were formed to show us what is filmed by the first camera. Then this was enlarged! The quality goes directly from the window and it has no value. Often this is done by people trying to hide the fact that they are fake with something. I don’t think this is the case here, but I always warn when dealing with this type of preparation.
The third problem with these shots is the fact that cameras that make up the CCTV system can see a clear transformation into an IR Nightvision mode as rooms placed in Dark. This means that a piece of unwanted dust floats on a breeze that suddenly appears to be a pure white light that moves quickly across the screen, as shown in the video in about 20 seconds. The same happens when insects fly in front of the camera in Nightvision mode, or even when crawling through the lens. Its proximity to the lens means that it is out of concentration and foggy, excessive infrared and turns it into a bright white color and what you see is a bright, bright, foggy body that moves. Certainly, it is not evidence of the entities of the paranormal.
Other images are provided as shown below for the newspaper and they are presented as evidence of the heavenly ghosts, but this simply indicates the lack of understanding of abnormal cases and also shows the lack of research or pure ignorance by ghost fishermen.
These anomalies are simply by air -to -focused molecules that are lit by camera flash. Not all specifications of dust see in this way-only those who approach enough lens to be out of concentration and luminous. The ghost fishermen who still offer heavenly bodies as evidence to ask one question to themselves; Is it strange to depict the molecules outside the concentration in the air when taking pictures with a flash in an old and dusty building? (The answer is “no”, if you are wondering.)
