Llifs – Public Opinion Court in exchange for peer review

There is a famous quote that I cannot find the original source of:

“Opinions resemble the holes of $$. Everyone has one but they believe that each other stink!”

I think this greatly summarizes social media for me. As the millennium generation, I have been here since the beginning of social media, and I witnessed up and fall. From talking via ICQ or in MSN chat rooms (#Melbourne chat is where I met my husband now on the occasion of) until I have my favorite song in stature as my topic on myspace, they all had. Soon it was pivotal for places like Facebook and X. I spent about 11 years after social media, and at some point it looked like a really great place to find similar people to think. There has been a decrease in recent years. I feel that I noticed this with humanity in general, and although I may also be my life and I became just an angry middle -aged lady, I feel that people have changed. It is not nice, it is not patient and it seems that the entitlement is flowing. When you have a place like social media, which is completely unorganized, people can say things or behave in a way that does not dare it personally. It has also become a land of reproduction to mislead information with a mentality.If you do not do it on my way, you are doing it wrong. “. This is clearly a big problem when it comes to supernatural research.

In 2017, I published an article called Poilizer review is much more important than Facebook Who was mainly encouraged researchers/investigators to search for the opinion of their peers instead of just spreading exciting content on social media for likes. I got a lot of violent reaction for this purpose. There was a lot of comments such as “I will publish what I want on my pages! ” But using a more colored language. They missed my view. My initial points were that instead of publishing something automatically online to say that a look at this video hit this like a button, consult your trusted super sponsors for their opinions to help expose or provide an insight into this proposed evidence. It also indicated that many people do this only by publishing on social media, but it is somewhat lost in noise and excitement because people do not want to watch a boring video where nothing happens. When you have something that is likely to be really good, it is sometimes when the online strands come out with their opinions that you did not invite but you have somewhat because you publicly published it. It comes with the region. Some of the worst comments can actually come from his colleagues and supernatural groups because you dare do something different for them.

So it reaches a stage where you ask, what is the point?

The paranormal field is largely irregular. Sometimes we need to be examined by our peers. I know that there are things or mistakes that I committed in the past, and I didn’t really think I was crossing a line until I spoke to their peers. No one is perfect and we will all make mistakes. This is the way we grow and which I think determines us. Do we bear accountability and look at growth as a person or do we blame someone else? One of the things that always blows in my mind is that when a person is not for great things, instead of accountability, anger is directed to a person who brings it. Instead of holding accountability, the blame is changed. Jealousy is often used as a cause or excuse. I think this serves selfly and not the case in most cases. Although this may be true in some cases, but if someone calls for something, it is usually not worried, not backward. Blame jealousy again is another way to change responsibility.

People have different levels of what they think is OK and what is not, which is why there is a lot of division in the field of paranormal. The problem with this height in interaction on social media is that when many of them become largely negative, people tend to not listen to any kind of comments with the start of defense mechanisms automatically. As human beings, taking criticism is difficult. I get hurt by some of the comments I made even when you are constructive. It is difficult to explain the tone on social media, and there can be a high line between presenting constructive criticism and smart discussion through a frankly attack.

So where do we go from here? In order to work the pendant, people must be accepted for him and are ready to accept that they may be wrong or may not find what they are looking for. I think many of them are related to what you want to get out of your extraordinary journey. If you just want to go and try things, attend investigations, take some pictures, and keep all of them for all of you, you go to them! If you really want to go further and document things in an attempt to produce what you think is evidence of the paranormal, not only you are ready to stand by her, but be ready to be wrong. The paranormal is very personal, and even today I was talking to someone who had no super experience before. They were investigating with me before, and more than that to find out what was the case but they didn’t think much about it. They had experience in their daily lives that made them retreat and really say.amazing“Yes, I can enter and expose what happened. We can say it was a coincidence, and she was reading in nothing. It was not really important because it was a special thing. She does not need a public opinion court or a group of her peers to tell her what she lived; it was something she knew in her heart. Perhaps there are no firm answers, and may not mean that she was not discovered, only.