For decades, academics and scientists have tried different ways to test if people are able to send and receive messages at the level of risk.
One of the first tests occurred in the late nineteenth century by WF Barrett, who was looking into the allegations of the transmission of thought mentioned in my article Transmission. Barrett was soon informed of the sisters of Clere, a group of 5 brothers who have what was described as “The amazing ability to guess words, numbers, or objects that were hidden either in another room or under a cloth“By looking at the whereabouts of the hidden object, claim that they have a high success rate in determining the element remotely. To test if this is true, the Barrett used play papers or the like, to see if the topic can successfully define the card. From a year.
Near the end of the investigations, the concerned researchers found that girls had found a way to refer to each other with the sermon to help them make the correct guesses.
In a second series of experiments conducted by psychological researchers, Frederick Mairez and Edmund Gurny, they recruited two women to assist that was not known to the Cleari family. This means that no one can know the elements that will be chosen while all precautions have been taken to ensure that there is no sign or opportunity for a person to be affected. Experiments were conducted on April 13, 1882, (which is completely unrelated to a matter of 100 years of the day when she was born). Perhaps this is the reason why I feel such a link to risk experiences.
A full set of cards was used with the following results:
• 9 out of 14 experiments were guessed properly with 3 experiments that are completely failed
• There were 5 in 1 chance to properly guess the card
• Of the 450 experiences using cards and numbers, 260 of these used playing papers
Although it was recognized that the signal had occurred, the researchers felt that this seemed that it only happened when success rates decreased. While researchers still believe that these results are worth noting, experiments are largely credible due to the inherent deception.
While Barrett was involved in the use of playing papers to test the risk and the transmission of thought, he also participated in experiments to see if anyone could transfer the sense of taste and pain to another.
Pain and taste of mental transfer
To test if pain and taste can be transferred mentally, experiments have occurred in both hypnotic and natural. 20 powerful materials tasted in small bottles have been kept out of view. An additional special care has been taken to prevent the recipient from the smell of contents by accidentally. Strong odors have been avoided for this reason.
The recipient was sitting with his back to the agent (who was supervising the experiment) and was blindfolded. Then there was a taste (which also worked as a sender) was placed outside the room. They used to take a small material of the material, put it in their mouth and return to the room. Then they put their hands on the recipient’s shoulder to move the taste mentally to the recipient, and those who will then advocate what they tasted. No one else was allowed to speak during the experiment so that no person or his demand was affected.
On one occasion, when the sender tasted vinegar, the recipient said she felt.Acute tasteThen the sender took the mustard sample that the recipient stated,I now taste mustard“The taste of mustard is assumed to be polluted with the rest of this particular experience. The recipient could only taste mustard for the rest of the trial that day. The comprehensive experience was success despite some failures. It was determined that the success rate was exceeding what could be purely lucky.
The next step was to see if the pain could also be transferred between two people. Dr. Herdemann Persian, who was a professor of natural history at the University of Liverpool, was present to see these trials. Participation in the name of Miss Ralph with her back to investigators. They agreed to attach the pain themselves for the purpose of experimenting without any contact with Miss Ralph. Of the 20 experiments, in 10 Miss Ralph felt, I felt very accurately. In 6 of these experiments, I specified the exact location of the pain. In the remaining four experiments, you did not feel anything or the area you identified were completely wrong.
Random sensations of pain and taste
In his book “The appearances of thought and thought: examination of evidence on riskFrank Bodomor writes about what is considered spontaneous. In the above, we looked at very deliberate tests to transfer pain or taste. What about but when it seems to happen automatically?
No. 41. – From the lady. Arthur Severn.
Brantwood, Conston,
October 27, 1883.“I woke up at the beginning, and I felt that I had been hit a difficult blow to my mouth, in a distinct sense that I had been cut off and bleed under my upper lips, and seized my pocket handkerchief, and I caught it (in a little cannon) to the pot), as I sat in bed, and after a few seconds, when I prepared, I was not dealing with any blood. – But I looked at my watch, and I saw that it was seven, and the finding of Arthur (my husband) was not in the room, and I (rightly) concluded that he had to have gone out on the lake for an early sail, as he was fine.
“I slept after that. At breakfast (nine hides), Arthur came somewhat late, and I noticed that he went on intentionally away from me more than usual, and then, he put his pocket handkerchief on his lips, the way I did, I said,” Arthur, why are you doing it? He added a little, “I know you hurt yourself! He said: “Well, when I was sailing, he came suddenly, and suddenly throwing Al -Harith, and surprised me in the mouth, under the upper lip, and he was bleeding a good deal and would not stop.” Then I said, “Do you have any idea about the hour when that happened?” He answered, “It should be about seven.”
“Then I told me what happened to me, which surprised him, and all who were with us at breakfast.
“This happened here about three years ago in Bantowood, for me.
“Joan R. Severn.”
Mr. Severn Elena wrote on November 15, 1883, with a description of the trivial incident described by The Percipient, adding that after leaving the boat
“He walked home, of course keen to hide as much as much as possible for my mouth, entered another handkerchief in the breakfast room, and was able to say something about going out early. Or words in this sense.
Arthur Severn.
(Phantasms of the Living, Vol. I. PP, 188, 189.)
Parallel pain and taste
Often in achieving a paranormal, people will claim to taste something or feel the pain that is not their property. Many sensitive people believe that this spirit will drop this feeling on them. Whether this is the case or not, it tends more weight to the theory that souls are more Pottery interaction instead of physical manifestations. The risk depends on a sender and a future. If the soul is actually the consciousness of a person who was once living, it makes sense to be able to “transfer” his message in this case pain or taste through risk.
I would like to hear your thoughts about this interesting topic? Do you think that souls can transmit pain and taste? If so, is this an act, risk, or anything else? Do you think people can receive these signals in an unconfirmed manner like the above?
Reference
The scene of illusion: magic, the paranormal and collusion of the mind Matthew Lombins 2019
The appearances of thought and thought: Evidence of evidence on risk / by Frank Bodomor (1894))
Photography LISETT Kruusimäe: https://www.pexels.com/photo/peple-in-halloween-Ghost-costumes-having-picnic-in-Park-14043008/
If you enjoy Llifs, think about buying a book (known as Buy Me A Coffee but I don’t drink coffee and love books). Your donation helps to finance Llifs so that everyone can continue to access the wonderful content and resources of free paranormal!