Two days ago, I wrote a blog post entitled “He hated the hateful women of Al -Othman menAbout Lon Strickler (Phantoms and Monsters) and Tobias Wayland (Fortean). In a special collective chat, the couple had a discussion about a paranormal researcher named Alison Journal, and how they believed they believed were in the field of hidden research related to “Motherman” scenes in Chicago 2011/2017. One of the comments was made about how Jornlin was “like a bad cold” and another about how it was entitled to “bathing” in a river, which was interpreted by others (rightly) as suffering from a pledge to threaten him.
My blog post has been shared a lot and surprised the number of visitors to my blog. It is clear, for me, at least, that a large number of people – including some of the very influential figures inside the Puzzy and encrypted science circles – feel disgusting to know how Jornlin was dealt with, and in the behavior of these two people. I haven’t heard about Lon Strickler or Tobias Wayland before this week, and I am certainly not aware of their books and projects related to Motherman’s scenes about Chicago. The discussion of their discussion focused on Jornlin and how it was not justice (in their opinions) that she called for speaking at the Mothman Festival. Obviously, they felt that they deserved to call more, and they talked about it in a way that indicates that they believed that Jornlin spoke in this event to achieve them personally.
I can’t look at her head, but my opinion is that the hard work that Jornlin put to search for the reports of Chicago – including visiting all the sites concerned (more than 50 places), and the work that I put in creating its presentation, was likely to be because of her passion for the topic, not about these men. Horror shock.
Thinking about the comments made by Allison Jornlin by Stikkler and Wayland, I think their malice came as a result of the couple threatened by another person who encroaches on what he believes is their lands – the contemporary Chicago scenes. Not only another person, but a very qualified person in his research methods to the point that they brought the fully illusion by discovering that the reported scenes were fake. Jornlin disturbed the questions that Strickler and Wayland did not do, and in order to accept them, it would also require acceptance that they have been deceived, or they did not recognize the uncomfortable truth and they had kept it from others. I can’t look at their heads and definitely know, but I got one of these reasons and no Because they believe Jornlin is a bad researcher.
However, for the elegant who is looking for the credit that is believed to be a debtor, he does not like Strickler It gives Thanks to others – even when their work tears and uses it on its website. For example, in 2010, a woman discovered that Strickler had taken work from her website and offered it without credit. I wrote an e -mail that reads:
We have been alerted by a few of our readers that you use our copyrights, including drawings and articles without our permission to your blog. We ask to remove all our copyrights, and to respect the copyright law.
Apparently, Strickler did not like this. His response indicates that he felt that he is entitled to use their work, not accredited, for some good. He threatened to transfer his supporters against her by responding:
“For any reason that your organization wants to not find as much information as possible about these phenomena, your privilege. You removed both elements and removed your organization from our list of contacts. Your position will be observed and your response to this incident to my reader’s readers. Why do any organization think about“ credit ”about finding the truth out of me. This is the real problem …
Likewise, the man who continued for me to tell me about his work has been separated from Strickler, tells a completely different meeting, with Strickler’s apology and claimed that he did not realize in some way. The post was fixed shortly after that.
I am sure that the fact that the apology was issued to a man, and a woman was released in the same threatened and delicate e -mail is just a coincidence. However, my email from Lon Strickler makes me think perhaps not such a coincidence.
“You realize that you are printing the comments that were cut and pastes from a private conversation?” I started a color email, ending “I file a complaint with WordPress.”
Comments have been announced long before they read, and although there is a moral gray area about the re -posting of special comments, I think this should be considered on the basis of each case separately. In this case, I felt that sharing the comments in my original blog post was justified to highlight a larger issue (intimidation, bullying, and hate women) within the extraordinary search circles. It should also be noted that the biggest and fearful people tried to intimidate me to remove the blog posts or apologize for my criticism before, and they also did not succeed. Not only LON misunderstand how to work, but also how WordPress also works. I host my own blog on my server and any complaint will come to me. I did not receive a complaint because the host leads me to believe that Strickler is not a man in his speech.
Mothman men are intimidating trying to intimidate critics in silence because only they want to be architects for their legacies as a wonderful paranormal researchers who follow the steps of men like John Keel who came before. As my late mom said, they are myths in their shower water … and I think they just pulled the plug.
