So, this is the thing. One of the central lessons that I learned after I participated in doubt is that a bad idea deserves to be called to be called for, and that it is at the heart of your argument or Against an idea, you should make sure that you only attack the idea, not the person or people who make it, or those who carry the idea to be correct. To do this To a person This is a logical fallacy and that is not cold.
I also know, from experience, that there are some ideas that people get completely defensive when they indicate how bad the idea or stupidity. For example, when I saw some religious people claim that their prayers could treat multiple sclerosis and cancer, I told the Advertising Standards Authority, which then told them “Don’t do that.” There was a little international drama on this topic. The idea – that prayer is treated – what was criticized, but people found it really difficult to distinguish between an idea of their right to believe in the aforementioned idea. Nobody -especially I am -is foolish if someone thinks that prayer can be treated, or that Jesus Christ himself appeared on the tortilla once -but as soon as you begin to make claims (especially implemented allegations) and then it becomes another complete position.
I do not care if it is bothering you when people say that prayer cannot be treated, but I will defend your right to believe that it is possible … just as I will defend the right of others to say that it is no. But when your bad thoughts begin to influence the lives of others, you change and deserve to be called.
For this reason I find it so ridiculous that KPFA radio, then recently Remove the platforms Richard Dukensmale “While KPFA categorically supports freedom of serious expression, we do not support abusive speech.
This is some strange Doublespeak there.
more than Guardian Free comment, Philip Henner writes The only way he and their friends can participate in Praid 2017 are through the bracelets of companies that came with a list of rules. A very different experience, Henner writes, about previous years, and when pride was something new. He reminded me of the closing scene of the film Pride When the main characters are informed that if they will participate in the gay career of Braid with political slogans, they must do this in the back of the procession because this year was supposed to be a party.
When our lives are politicized as LGBTQ individuals today based on the bad ideas that people believe, watching this scene was a blow to the face.
When Islamic extremists throw people about the buildings because they are LGBTQ, they say “sex with Islamic homosexual phobia” in response, have they gone away? It seems like this The Experience of the former Muslim Council for Great Britain (CEMB) in Braid 2017 Anything that goes through.
“We need to stand in the face of racism and intolerance and at the same time, we must be able to criticize religion and religious right … People must be allowed to criticize without threat or intimidation.” Those are the words of Maryam Namesi, co -founder of CEMB. They were recently accused by a mosque in London of “inciting hatred” against Muslims to participate in Brid 2017 with remarkable slogans that read “God is gay” and “curse on gay Islamists.”
I think these same feelings – are that the religious texts taught by wrong people who have harmful hateful agendas – I have seen it. Dawkins De-Platform from Speaking Share. I think that the question we must ask here is what is harmful in reality – those who have criticized precious ideas, or those who do not allow challenges bad ideas for fear of causing a crime? Do we not harm those who suffer as a result of harmful ideas if we do not challenge bad ideas regardless of how to offend others?
Do we not wash years of struggle, persecution, hatred and discrimination when we tell gay people how do we behave in pride? When we tell people LGBTQ that their spaces will not be political anymore? Because sweet manufacturers and fast food companies are now our dreaded allies?
We are used to insisting on your silence; These days, we have confirmed that there is no reason for you to speak. This is improvement, right? Now go away. Shut up. Listen to our interpretations of your existence. Watch the licensed buoys of gay insurance companies pass from behind the barrier. And it is grateful as I tell you to be, “Henner writes about the way it is believed that the straight people still abuse gay people in places of the aforementioned minorities, such as pride.
It is anxious, more and more, as if life itself comes with a list of unannounced rules and that we all live a life, strongly, close to the practice of offensive speech if we are not careful. Criticism turns us into a marginalization to the aggressors, who are guilty of committing an unlimited intellectual crime, as vanity is at risk of bruises.
Where is the turning point? Where is the happy way between a minority that allows it to harm another minority? Who should make a sacrifice to spare someone sad feelings? When is the fighting and defending itself allowed and not allowed? When is people allowed to criticize criticism? Certainly, it is not when pride is commercial, the former people are classified on Islamic phobia and organizers who wander in fear of harming feelings.
