Home Anomalien “We have something crazy under the lock and the key”

“We have something crazy under the lock and the key”

0


Representative Porleson commented on UAP techniques.

MP Porleson was vocal about strange bodies (UAPS) and the need for transparency. And if not in the defense committees, it is pushed to reach classified technology, Saying: “We owe the American people to understand the place of money spending … Someone discovered something – some advanced forms of payment or technology – that may actually change our lives.”

Hidden budgets are suspected to fund these projects, echoing David Grosh’s claims, who are informed about the private sector secrecy.

Boricon is skeptical of strange assets, but achieves accurately. After briefing with Arrow (UAP government office), he pointed out that “David (Grosh) gave them more information, I think, which gave us.”

He also emphasized that the FBI agents have seen uncomplicated things (“some different people in the team have already seen things”), but they admit that Congress is prohibited from major surroundings: “We have been banned … from receiving the surroundings we need.”

When asked about the “strange mummies” shown in Mexico, he was doubting their health. “I am not convinced of any of these real artifacts,” he said.

Burlison’s focus is technology, not foreigners. He was frustrated by the secrecy around advanced drones or payment systems that could revolutionize travel: “Will it be good that you have a technique (anti -gravity) instead of sitting on a plane that smells of sweat?”

It is suspected that the United States has a “very crazy and advanced … under the extreme lock and key”, warning that this technology can shake global security if weapons.

Despite the obstacles (“was banned at every turn”), it is achieved in the mysterious body scenes, such as the mysterious “heavenly bodies” that may have been linked to drones (“like hunting bob”).

While doubtful about the “strange mummies” in Peru, Grush urged him to look deeper, citing the surrounding similar beings. Porleson is still cautious but committed: “We are trying to reach the bottom of this.”

Public doubts continue, even after Grusch’s constitutional testimony about “biological materials” recovered from accidents. Without proving confidentiality, the discussion is embracing – but the action of Porleson maintains pressure on the answers.

“What matters to me, what seems to have discovered something – some forms of advanced payment or technology – that may actually change throughout our lives, make it for the better, but it is clear that it is in a trial stage or try it, and I want to know, to what extent we spend on this,” he said.

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exit mobile version