Ah, the Nice Lake Monster. I love Nessie because although it is not technically real, people do not stop talking about it at all – especially during the summer months. I also love the physical site because it is beautiful, so I always feel a little defense about the Loch Nes mystery when people come and do a mission to expose the story.
The final question is, “Does the monster lie down in the dark waters of Lish Nice?” And I think the answer is “perhaps not”, which clearly generates a question “so, what do people see when they see a monster?” This is a good question ™. Certainly the evidence may indicate that there are no monsters in that water, but instead many things are wrong because of a brutal thing. From records, trees, stones, ripples, tidal, birds, fish, people and deer – the list goes on and extends …
Recently, there has been a wave of main headlines that announce that scientists discovered that Nissi was actually a snake. I have seen mixed reactions to this because some people responded to this by saying things like “Aha! He sees! There is nothing like monstersWhile others responded by saying. “What are you talking about? Snakes? truly?“
I am in the second group. What are you talking about? Snakes? truly?
It should be noted that the Zoology Center in Fortian has long said that the snakes could be the cause of the monster scenes in Lucch Nice and also in Windermerre (where a monster called Bunisi is not swimming) and called it this Super Sea Snake theory. As I adore CFZ, I do not necessarily think that this is a suitable explanation for all lake monsters scenes in these sites. Although recent research by a team from the University of Outago shows that there is a large amount of DNA on the sea snake in Loch Ness, I think it is somewhat joyful to indicate that many of the lake monsters scenes can be explained as a way. It is very elegant and very comfortable. Sometimes, when the rational interpretation seems slightly to solve a lot, it is not evident to be very rational.
For those who are not familiar with, genetics professor Neil Jimmel led a team in DNA scan in Loch Ness to explore the biological diversity of the lach and always used the lunch of a lake monster always to attract attention to their research. They even confessed like their press conference, as Gemmell told the journalists who were collected:
“We were talking about science all the time and we were using monsters as a bait. I came to this with the view that there was no monster … I wanted to understand the biological diversity of Loch Ness and we did it well.”
The Guardian continues to report that “Jimmel said that the massive volume of dual -fabric dubbing surprised him and his team. He added that maintaining a straight face: “We do not know if the DNA is the sea snake that we discover is from the giant sea snake or just small snakes.”
So … we have moved from the main headlines that explain that the science has explained everyone the LOCH Ness by discovering that it is snakes to actually discover that there is some DNA in Loch Nes and scientists who found that he believed that snakes may be large or may be small but even know them really flam.
Busy the ground is it? I will say it again – leave Nessi alone, people. Leave Nessi alone.
