Home Ghost Geek YouTube reveals the risks in spreading wrong information if they are not...

YouTube reveals the risks in spreading wrong information if they are not achieved from facts

0


YouTube is filled with low -quality videos of ghost fishermen who are claiming to take a parallel activity, and often dependent on bad photography or fake clips. Since this trend has grown over the years, it was accompanied by a dark appearance of YouTube, providing alternative explanations and exposing the so -called evidence provided by these ghost hunting channels.

Berdo visits 30 east Drive

In August 2024, DOINKING BEARDOGETSEED, Share a video of ghost chasing at 30 East DriveThe famous UK website for its supposed warehouse, the Black Monk for PETEFRACT. My curiosity to see a Debunker approach, I watched the video but left with disappointment.

Berdu reported that his team felt “scary” upon arrival but used a triple scale to find strong EMF readings of the upper floor. From video examination, it seems that it is used 30 pounds from Amazon Which measures electric and magnetic fields, as well as temperature. Berdo team concluded that the boiler could explain strange feelings – this was the first red flag.

A video still

The meter is placed on the bathroom floor

Later on the video, the TRIFILD scale is placed on the bathroom floor where it is recorded up to 180 mg (although it is unclear whether this is MG or µT). The meter is located near the door, with an electric socket on the other side of the wall. Investigators interact, saying:

“This is a ridiculous amount of EMF.”

“180 … these are worrying levels.”

“I don’t know if this is dangerous … but this will lead to horrific feelings.”

Berdu then shows the first carbon monoxide by the boiler in another room, explaining that they are looking for whether it was a “feeling of waste” on a previous visit caused by the leakage of carbon monix, although the detector showed nothing. Then it suggests that the high EMF in the bathroom can be a worker.

EMFS in your home is not dangerous

The idea is that EMF in your home is dangerous, dependent on the wrong information that claims that radiation from energy sources can cause serious health conditions, such as cancer. There is no evidence to support this and A great article for the skeptical magazine, writtenIncluding how a study of more than 53,000 cases of children with cancer was published from 1962-2008 in British Cancer JournalWhich is unambiguously concluded that EMF is not associated with cancer.

EMFS is a home appliance and nearby power lines safe at typical exposure levels. I have found research constantly no Evidence that low -frequency EMFS poses major health risks. The idea that EMF is harmful is a common plot that extends to contracts, and in recent years, it has evolved into similar concerns about wireless technology, mobile phones and 5G. This wrong information has become very prevalent through social media Even OFC.

EMFS is unlikely to feel strange

The search for complex electromagnetic fields (EMFS) and abnormal experiments led to mixed results. Michael Persenger, known as the “helmet of God” experiences, claimed that he stimulates such experiences by exposing the time lobes of the participants to the magnetic fields. However, symmetrical copies have failed to reproduce these results. Granqvist et al. (2005) conducted a double -blind study to repeat the work of Persinger, and he found no evidence that EMFS raised mystical or sensory experiences; Instead, character features such as absorption and the new inclinations of the new age have shown. Likewise, the Hununt’s Chris French (2009) did not find any support for EMFS that causes abnormal experiences.

Some indicate that EMFS should cause strange sensations for those exposed to them due to magnetic stimulation (TMS), which uses magnetic fields (measurement 2-3 Teslas) to urge electrical currents in the brain for medical purposes. It is often said that if this method can affect the brain, the EFS must also, right? Well, TMS uses the fields much stronger than 180 mg (or 0.000018T) measured in 30 East Drive, which is very weak that does not cause “horrific feelings”, or any feelings ever. The 2T magnetic field will reach 20,000,000 mg – at this point, I will be less inclined to find an leaked kettle and instead search for the hidden magnetic resonance scanner!

Are ghost fishermen depicting themselves suitable observers?

It is disappointing to see YouTube channel, which challenges bad evidence on the same paranormal using the wrong information to explain the alleged super activity. I do not think it is unreasonable to say that one hopes to devote YouTube channels dedicated to exposing false or inaccurate claims themselves made an effort to support the values ​​of critical thinking and scientific integrity. However, regardless of EMF’s wrong information, during Beardo’s visit to 30 East Drive, they also extinguish the spotlight, using Camcorders night vision, mostly in photographing themselves, leaving things for ghosts to manipulate them, challenging ghosts to do things. All the things that have been taken into account, maybe it is not sudden to find ghost hunters who make typical ghost fishermen ‘mistakes …

Reference

Cook CM and Persiner, M. A (1997). “The experimental induction of” sensitive presence “in regular topics and an exceptional topic. Cognitive and motor skills, volume 85, p. 683-693 (online) is available on: (Access to PDF here)

French, CC, Haque, U., Bunton-Stasyshyn, R., & Davis, R. (2009). “Hunt”: an attempt to build a “inhabited” room by treating complex electromagnetic and infrared fields, The cortex is a magazine devoted to studying the nervous system and behaviorFolder. 45, no. 5, p. 619-629. (Online) is available on: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.10.011

Granqvist, P., Fredrikson, M., Unge, P., Hagenfeldt, A., Valind, S., Larhammar, D., & Larsson, M. (2005). “Sensitive presence and Sufi experiences are predicted through the signal, and not through the application of the vulnerable complex magnetic fields across the skull.” Neuroscience messagesFolder. 379, no. 1, p. 1-6. (Online) is available in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.10.057



Source link

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exit mobile version